Publications

Regulatory Clarity for Impact Investing

A Timely Proposal

For years, institutional interest in impact-oriented investment strategies has been growing. Yet from a regulatory standpoint, Impact Investing has remained a grey area in Europe. A new initiative from a multi-stakeholder taskforce – supported by industry associations such as BAI and BIII – now puts a concrete proposal on the table, outlining how Impact Investing could be positioned within the SFDR framework.
golding-capital-christian-schuetz
Christian Schütz

From Practice to Regulation

Rather than introducing a rigid new category, the position paper proposes a principles-based structure for Impact Investing as a complement to the existing SFDR system. It aims to provide clarity without overregulation. The proposal follows a pragmatic approach: it builds on existing strategies and offers the flexibility needed to reflect market diversity. The suggested definition is based on established principles within the impact investing community: investments made with the intention to generate both financial returns and positive, measurable social or environmental outcomes.

What Defines Impact Investing

The paper outlines four core principles that distinguish Impact Investing:

  • Intentionality – A clear, strategic intention to achieve impact that goes beyond ESG integration
  • Measurability – Demonstrable contributions from both the investment and the investor, supported by defined KPIs
  • Impact Management – A structured approach to steering, monitoring, risk management, and active engagement
  • Transparency – Regular and transparent reporting on progress towards stated impact objectives

This framework allows for a clear distinction from general ESG approaches while acknowledging the variety of strategies and asset classes in the market.

Why Now Matters for Institutional Investors

The timing is politically favourable: the upcoming SFDR review presents a window of opportunity to shape the future of European investment regulation. The EU Platform on Sustainable Finance has already laid the groundwork, proposing categories such as Transition, Sustainable, and general ESG investments. While it highlights the need for a dedicated Impact Investing category, it has left the detailed design of such a framework open. At the same time, market demand is growing. According to recent surveys (e.g. bfinance, GIIN), many institutional investors are planning to significantly increase their allocations to impact strategies – viewing them as a logical evolution and intensification of their ESG efforts.

A Step Towards Market Maturity

This proposal for how SFDR could approach Impact Investing marks an important milestone towards greater clarity, visibility, and scalability of impact strategies across Europe. It provides a shared foundation for channelling capital more effectively towards sustainable transformation. The consultation paper is an open invitation to investors, market participants and associations to engage in shaping the future. The more stakeholders contribute, the more accurately the framework can reflect the diversity and depth of impact-driven strategies.

Note: The authors of the proposal are part of an open working group made up of industry associations, market participants and institutional investors. Christian Schütz, Managing Director & Head of Sustainable Investing, and Dr. Andreas Nilsson, Managing Director & Head of Impact Investments at Golding, were involved in the drafting process.

Current publications can be found on the news pages of BAI and BIII.

Related News

Press Contact

golding-capital-susanne-stolzenburg

Susanne Stolzenburg

Head of Marketing & Communications · Director

You would like to find out more about Golding Capital Partners or are you interested in a background discussion on topics relating to private markets?

Get in touch